Titled - "The Queen Mother"
Written by: Pastor Bob Lawrenz
Secular history describes the events in The Book of Esther during the reign of Ahasuerus. So, we must remember that Ahasuerus is simply a title meaning “King.” History accredits the Biblical history to Xerxes I, King of Persia, son of Artaxerxes, in timing and in order of occurrence.
For those that doubt scripture’s historical truth, we have a duplicate record of events recorded in secular history to prove that the Biblical record is true. What we are seeing in the differences in names not as a stumbling block, but as history from a different source.
The historical books in the Bible are not just fanciful descriptions of human events, but accurate portrayals of history from cultures that use the original cultural habits of their own times, complete with titles used as names. The Bible’s historical books have proven to be accurate by following histories gathered from non-Biblical methods. Such is the case for the Book of Esther. This is not Fantasy Island, but history gathered from another viewpoint.
The Persians spoken of in Esther are the same ethnic people who renamed their land, Iran in 1935 A.D. (C.E.). The Iranians we hear of in the media today are modern-day Persians. The attitudes of about 20% of them towards the Jews of the world are identical to the views of Haman in the Book of Esther. It is a deep-seated hatred toward Israel as a nation, and the world’s Jewish population wherever they reside. It is founded upon jealousy, greed, and pride, just as we read of in the story of Esther between Haman and Mordecai. The Jews have learned not to trust the Hamans of Iran, while Islam’s 20% of Iran clings to an irrational hatred of the Jewish people. And oddly enough, these two peoples are cousins, sharing much of their ancient history, being descended from Shem, one of Noah’s sons from the days of the world-wide flood. What they do not share is the Biblical Prophecy to Abraham and his descendants.
Secular history describes the events in The Book of Esther during the reign of Ahasuerus. So, we must remember that Ahasuerus is simply a title meaning “King.” History accredits the Biblical history to Xerxes I, King of Persia, son of Artaxerxes, in timing and in order of occurrence.
For those that doubt scripture’s historical truth, we have a duplicate record of events recorded in secular history to prove that the Biblical record is true. What we are seeing in the differences in names not as a stumbling block, but as history from a different source.
The historical books in the Bible are not just fanciful descriptions of human events, but accurate portrayals of history from cultures that use the original cultural habits of their own times, complete with titles used as names. The Bible’s historical books have proven to be accurate by following histories gathered from non-Biblical methods. Such is the case for the Book of Esther. This is not Fantasy Island, but history gathered from another viewpoint.
The Persians spoken of in Esther are the same ethnic people who renamed their land, Iran in 1935 A.D. (C.E.). The Iranians we hear of in the media today are modern-day Persians. The attitudes of about 20% of them towards the Jews of the world are identical to the views of Haman in the Book of Esther. It is a deep-seated hatred toward Israel as a nation, and the world’s Jewish population wherever they reside. It is founded upon jealousy, greed, and pride, just as we read of in the story of Esther between Haman and Mordecai. The Jews have learned not to trust the Hamans of Iran, while Islam’s 20% of Iran clings to an irrational hatred of the Jewish people. And oddly enough, these two peoples are cousins, sharing much of their ancient history, being descended from Shem, one of Noah’s sons from the days of the world-wide flood. What they do not share is the Biblical Prophecy to Abraham and his descendants.
“And God said unto Abraham, ‘Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad (Ishmael), and because of thy bondwoman (Hagar); in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.’” - Genesis 21:12
Bobservations' Column: Audio Version
Sunday Morning Message:
Esther 6:1-14 - "The Queen Mother"
Summary/Additional Commentary & Definitions:
He orders the royal chronicles to be read and realizes that Mordecai was never rewarded for saving his life. King Xerxes, perhaps hoping the dry records would lull him to sleep, instead hears the story of Mordecai, a Jewish man who had once uncovered a plot to assassinate the king but had never been rewarded for his loyalty. Xerxes, realizing the oversight, immediately decides to honor Mordecai... and you won't believe how. But what makes this moment even more remarkable is its timing. At that very instant, Haman is on his way to request the execution of Mordecai.
By the end of the verses today, Mordecai is probably the most confused man on the planet. He and his people have been set for destruction, and yet, his mortal enemy has come to him with a royal robe, and the king’s horse, and after placing the robe on him and placing him on the king’s horse, he has conducted him through the city square honoring him as a town crier would – “Thus shall it be done to the man whom the king delights to honor.”
As soon as that was over, the robe was removed, the horse was led back to the royal stalls, and he went back to sit at the king’s gate as if nothing ever happened. His people are still set for destruction, and yet the king honored him. It’s hard to see how the king delighted to honor him while reveling in destroying him. Little does Haman know that the tables are about to turn dramatically.
Sunday Morning Audio Message:
Key Words and Definitions with Reference:
The Book (6:1) - Five years (cf. 2:16 with 3:7) had intervened since Mordecai's loyal but unrewarded act (cf. 2:23). At exactly the proper moment, God providentially intervened so the king suffered insomnia, called for the book of records, read of Mordecai's unrewarded deeds five years past, and then desired to reward him (cf. Daniel 6:18).
What Honour (6:3) - The king has certainly not forgotten the deed of Mordecai. However, it was a reward for the deed that concerns him at this point. It is noted by Herodotus (Herod. viii. 85, 90) that in Persia there was a special list which was compiled and maintained of those who had done some special service for the king. It was considered a duty to acknowledge them for such things, and it would practically be a legal right for something noteworthy to be so conferred. The lack of any reward may have been that it was forgotten due to the development of other busy duties in the king’s life, or it could be that the court simply didn’t pursue reminding the king because Mordecai was a Jew. Whatever the reason, their response came back to the ears of the king…
Who is in the Court? (6:4) - The drama intensified as Haman arrived at just the wrong time and for just the wrong reason. One can sense the urgency of Haman’s arrival at the palace. It is still early in the morning, and yet he has excitedly gone to the palace with all alacrity to have his plan executed at the earliest possible moment. He probably didn’t sleep any more than the king did, tossing and turning at the delightful thought of fulfilling his plan of the previous evening.
Haman Standeth (6:5) - The remarkable sixth and seventh chapters of Esther contain one of the most incisively ironical narratives in all literature, not to mention an amazing testimony of providential ordering of events. Haman, swollen with both pride and hatred of those who refused to pander to his pride, appears at the king's court just as the king is preparing special honor for the very man Haman is preparing to hang! Even though there were certainly other officers present, it seems that it was an unexpected surprise that Haman would be there at this time. Being the one who was granted the king’s signet ring back in Chapter 3, it seems that the timing of his coming was quite propitious. He would certainly be well-suited to attending to such an important duty of kingly matters. The irony increases…
More than to Myself (6:6) - The inordinate pride of Haman (like that of Satan) contributed to his humiliation (Proverbs 16:18; 18:12; compare Ezekiel 28:17).
Set Upon His Head (6:8) - That is, the royal crown (or crest) was to be placed on the head of the royal steed! Stone carvings of horses so arrayed have been found in Persepolis, one of ancient Persia's capitals.
A Horse (6:8) - A royal horse carries much the same symbolism of wearing a royal robe. It would be evident to all that the one being carried was truly highly honored. In Genesis 41, Joseph was made to ride in Pharaoh’s second chariot. And when Solomon was to be ordained as king in David’s place, David directed that he be taken on his own mule to Gihon for the ceremony. This honor would be made all the more distinct by another symbol of kingly authority…
Royal Crest (6:8) - It is argued whether this is a royal crown for the rider’s head, a royal crown from the king’s head, or a royal crown for the horse’s head. The Hebrew, however, is specific. It is for the horse. Ancient Assyrian monuments depict the king’s horse wearing a sort of crown. A special crown or crest is something that would identify it as the king’s own horse. The honor would be great. This verse contains the last use of this word Kether, or crown, in the Bible. History affirms that horses were adorned with the royal crown.
The City Square (6:9) - Mordecai had been there the day before in sackcloth and ashes (4:1), he now would arrive with royal honor much to Haman's disbelief.
Mordecai the Jew (6:10) -To ensure exactly who would be granted the honor, he signifies the name, the race, and the position held. All of this would have been recorded for him in the chronicles, and he is simply repeating what was just then relayed to him.
Some call into question the historical truth of the account because of these words. They ask how it is possible that the king would have forgotten that he had consigned all of the Jews to death and so honor a Jew in this way. However, Haman’s words in Chapter 3 never said anything about the Jews.
All he said to the king was, “There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among the people in all the provinces of your kingdom.” With a little more talk about them, he offered to have them eliminated and to place the money in the king’s treasuries to do so. The subject of who these people were was never mentioned. For all the king knew, Haman was speaking of gypsies, tramps, and thieves. It was Haman who harbored the ill will, and the recompense for his wickedness towards the Jews was now coming back upon him.
Some call into question the historical truth of the account because of these words. They ask how it is possible that the king would have forgotten that he had consigned all of the Jews to death and so honor a Jew in this way. However, Haman’s words in Chapter 3 never said anything about the Jews.
All he said to the king was, “There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among the people in all the provinces of your kingdom.” With a little more talk about them, he offered to have them eliminated and to place the money in the king’s treasuries to do so. The subject of who these people were was never mentioned. For all the king knew, Haman was speaking of gypsies, tramps, and thieves. It was Haman who harbored the ill will, and the recompense for his wickedness towards the Jews was now coming back upon him.
Mourning . . . Head Covered (6:12) - What a difference a day makes! His imagined honors had quickly turned to unimaginable humiliation. While Mordecai took his honors in stride, Haman has not fared so well. There is urgency in returning to his house, as if he needed to shut himself in from the outside world. And on the way there he both mourned, a sign of deep distress, and he covered his head, a sign of exceeding shame. When David was overthrown by his son Absalom, it says in 2 Samuel 15:30 that as he fled, he ascended the Mount of Olives weeping as he went, and he had his head covered and went barefoot. Likewise, it says this in Psalm 44 –
“My confusion is continually before me, and the shame of my face hath covered me,” Psalm 44:15.
Jeremiah also speaks of the shame of drought, a sign of the Lord’s displeasure –
“Because the ground is parched, for there was no rain in the land, The plowmen were ashamed; They covered their heads.” - Jeremiah 14:4
This verse now introduces another set of two’s. Here Haman’s face is covered by himself at the beginning of his downfall as he flees to his house in shame, hoping for comfort. In verse 7:8, his face will be covered by others as he is led off to the gallows at his house in disgrace. They contrast in detail, but they confirm the full and final downfall of wicked Haman.
“My confusion is continually before me, and the shame of my face hath covered me,” Psalm 44:15.
Jeremiah also speaks of the shame of drought, a sign of the Lord’s displeasure –
“Because the ground is parched, for there was no rain in the land, The plowmen were ashamed; They covered their heads.” - Jeremiah 14:4
This verse now introduces another set of two’s. Here Haman’s face is covered by himself at the beginning of his downfall as he flees to his house in shame, hoping for comfort. In verse 7:8, his face will be covered by others as he is led off to the gallows at his house in disgrace. They contrast in detail, but they confirm the full and final downfall of wicked Haman.
You Have Begun to Fall (6:13) - Neither divine prophecy (Exodus 17:14) nor biblical history (1 Samuel 15:8,9) stood in Haman's favor. Haman's entourage seemed to have some knowledge of this biblical history. In Haman, we can see the truth of the proverb –
“Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone will have it roll back on him.” - Proverbs 26:27
Haman had metaphorically dug a pit for Mordecai, and he will fall into it; and he had attempted to roll away Israel, but they will roll right back upon him.
“Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone will have it roll back on him.” - Proverbs 26:27
Haman had metaphorically dug a pit for Mordecai, and he will fall into it; and he had attempted to roll away Israel, but they will roll right back upon him.
Haman to the Banquet (6:14) - There is a rapid succession of events which has come about in this chapter, culminating in this final verse. Whereas just one chapter before, he was bragging about being the only one invited to Esther’s banquet, now he is fearful of having made the wrong decision concerning the Jews. He needs time to think through what to do, but time is not his friend. Instead, the royal court has come to gather Haman for the second banquet of Esther. What was a point of bragging and hoped-for joy, would now be a tasteless time of trial and trepidation. One can almost anticipate the outcome, if not the events themselves, of what lies ahead at Esther’s banquet. Like a lamb led to slaughter. Haman was escorted off to his just due.


