Bobservations' Column
Titled - "Purging to Power"
Written by: Pastor Bob Lawrenz
In Acts 2:44 and 4:32, we read that the members of the Church had adopted a communal style of living, allowing anyone to use anything owned by anyone. Personal possessions were a thing of the past, and all things were held in common, for the good of the Church.
Today we see one of the pitfalls of commune-style living. Some members are wealthier than others, and sooner or later, the wealth dwindles. In full dedication, Church members gave all they had for the Church.
We will meet Ananias and his wife Sapphira today. We know little about this couple, other than what we read. They had a possession they were willing to sell, and gave a portion of the proceeds to the Apostles. Others had given all their possessions and made them available to anyone in the Church. Ananias and Sapphira had agreed to give only a portion to the Apostles. But for some reason, these two presented their gift as though it was all they had.
Communal living is essentially as old as humanity itself. Early hunter-gatherer societies, and many Indigenous cultures predating written history survived by pooling resources and sharing communal spaces.
Religious communes rose in the late middle-ages. Hippie communes became popular in the 1960’s. And Commune style living is still popular today among close friends; sharing resources, possessions and even domiciles.
Studies of Cast Societies, materialism, capitalism all promote reasons for commune-ism, evening out the wealth of a small group or an entire nation, such as Communist Russia. Karl Marx promoted this in his book, “Communist Manifesto.” His thinking was in philosophy, the crown peak of human thought. But the absolute wealth of such a society has to “go” someplace, and often it ends up going to those in governance, the minority ruling class. It can be dedicated to them, or quietly skimmed, away from public view.
“For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are my ways your ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts higher than your thoughts.” - Isaiah 55:8,9
“It is better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in princes.” - Psalm 118:9
Titled - "Purging to Power"
Written by: Pastor Bob Lawrenz
In Acts 2:44 and 4:32, we read that the members of the Church had adopted a communal style of living, allowing anyone to use anything owned by anyone. Personal possessions were a thing of the past, and all things were held in common, for the good of the Church.
Today we see one of the pitfalls of commune-style living. Some members are wealthier than others, and sooner or later, the wealth dwindles. In full dedication, Church members gave all they had for the Church.
We will meet Ananias and his wife Sapphira today. We know little about this couple, other than what we read. They had a possession they were willing to sell, and gave a portion of the proceeds to the Apostles. Others had given all their possessions and made them available to anyone in the Church. Ananias and Sapphira had agreed to give only a portion to the Apostles. But for some reason, these two presented their gift as though it was all they had.
Communal living is essentially as old as humanity itself. Early hunter-gatherer societies, and many Indigenous cultures predating written history survived by pooling resources and sharing communal spaces.
Religious communes rose in the late middle-ages. Hippie communes became popular in the 1960’s. And Commune style living is still popular today among close friends; sharing resources, possessions and even domiciles.
Studies of Cast Societies, materialism, capitalism all promote reasons for commune-ism, evening out the wealth of a small group or an entire nation, such as Communist Russia. Karl Marx promoted this in his book, “Communist Manifesto.” His thinking was in philosophy, the crown peak of human thought. But the absolute wealth of such a society has to “go” someplace, and often it ends up going to those in governance, the minority ruling class. It can be dedicated to them, or quietly skimmed, away from public view.
“For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are my ways your ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts higher than your thoughts.” - Isaiah 55:8,9
“It is better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in princes.” - Psalm 118:9
Bobservations' Column: Audio Version
Sunday Morning Message:
Acts 5:1-18 - Purging to Power
Summary/Additional Commentary & Definitions:
The story of Ananias and Sapphira is found in Acts 5, and it is a sad story, indeed. It actually begins at the end of chapter 4 with the description of the early church in Jerusalem, a group of believers so filled with the Holy Spirit that they were of one heart and one mind. Great power and grace were on the apostles, who preached and testified of the risen Savior. So knit together were the hearts of the people that they held all their possessions loosely and willingly shared them with one another, not because they were coerced but because they loved one another. Those who sold land and houses gave of their profits to the apostles, who distributed the gifts to those in need.
Two members of this group were Ananias and his wife, Sapphira; they also had sold a field. Part of the profit from their sale was kept back by the couple, and Ananias only laid a part of the money at the apostles’ feet. However, Ananias made a pretense of having given all the proceeds. This hypocritical show may have fooled some, but not Peter, who was filled with the power of the Spirit. Peter knew instantly that Ananias was lying—not just to him but to God—and exposed his hypocrisy then and there. Ananias fell down and died (Acts 5:4). When Sapphira showed up, she, too, lied to Peter and to God, saying that they had donated the entire proceeds of the sale of the land to the church. When her lie had been exposed, she also fell down and died at Peter’s feet.
Some speculate that these two deaths were from natural causes. Perhaps Ananias died from shock or guilt, but Peter pronounced Sapphira’s death before she died, and the coincidental timing and place of their deaths indicate that this was indeed God’s judgment. The question is why. Why would God kill two people for lying?
God’s reasons for bringing about the deaths of Ananias and Sapphira involve His abhorrence of sin, the hypocrisy of the couple, and the lesson for the rest of the church, both then and now. It can be easy today to gloss over the holiness of God, to forget that He is righteous and pure and that He hates sin wholeheartedly. This particular sin of hypocrisy in the church was dealt with swiftly and decisively.
The sudden, dramatic deaths of Ananias and Sapphira served to purify and warn the church. “Great fear seized the whole church” (Acts 5:11). Right away, in the church’s infancy, God made it plain that hypocrisy and dissimulation were not going to be tolerated, and His judgment of Ananias and Sapphira helped guard the church against future pretense. God laid the bodies of Ananias and Sapphira in the path of every hypocrite who would seek to enter the church.
Sunday Morning Audio Message: Coming Soon!
Key Words and Definitions with Reference:
Ananias . . . Sapphira (5:1) - Ananias is a transliteration of a common Hebrew name, Khananyah. That comes from khanan, meaning to show favor, or be gracious, and Yah, which is a contracted form of Yehovah, the Lord. Thus, the name means "Yah has been gracious." He is noted along "with Sapphira his wife." Her name is derived from the Hebrew word sappir, a sapphire. That is derived from saphar, to count or recount. The reason for this may be that the sapphire is an especially hard stone that may have been used to scratch other substances. As such, a tally could be made when counting. As she is the wife of Ananias, the account demonstrates that deceit of the heart can be something that spreads to others. It is not something isolated when it has its influencing effects. As such, it says that they, husband and wife, together “sold a possession.”
These are two classic examples of hypocrisy among Christians who faked their spirituality to impress others (cf. Matthew 6:1-6, 16-18; 15:7; 23:13-36). They were "in the congregation of those who believed" (4:32) and were involved with the Holy spirit (v. 3), but remained hypocrites.
These are two classic examples of hypocrisy among Christians who faked their spirituality to impress others (cf. Matthew 6:1-6, 16-18; 15:7; 23:13-36). They were "in the congregation of those who believed" (4:32) and were involved with the Holy spirit (v. 3), but remained hypocrites.
Kept Back Part (5:2) - The Greek work, translated as "kept back," is nosphizo. It signifies purloining pilfering, or embezzling. It is the clearly wrong action of setting apart something for oneself. In this case, the setting apart is not what is wrong. The disposition of the money would be up to them, However, what accompanies the setting apart of the money is what makes their actions inappropriate and sinful. It is clearly to be understood that their actions imply that the entire amount is
supposedly being offered to God. Thus, it is the lie that accompanies the offering that is
being focused on. Ananias has looked to find favor in the eyes of the people through a
dishonest display of charity. But the guilt of the act extends beyond him because of “his
wife also being aware of it.”
They are both complicit in the deceitful act, they had promised, perhaps publicly, that they were giving the full amount received to the Lord. Their outward sin was lying about how much they were giving to the church, but the deeper, more devastating sin was their spiritual hypocrisy based on selfishness.
Satan Filled Your Heart (5:3) - This is one of two times Satan is spoken of by name in Acts. The other being in Acts 26:18. It is a clear indication that he is alive and active in the world after the time of the cross. In this case, it was to fill the heart of Ananias. The heart is reflective of the seat of reason and understanding. Ananias’ thought process was clearly afflicted so that he would presume to be deceitful with the money that was intended for the aid of the church. It is an egregious offense because the apostles represented the leadership of the church, and they were those who demonstrated the power of God working through them. Ananias and Sapphira were satanically inspired, according to this scripture, this is in contrast to Barnabas's Spirit-filled gesture (4:37). There are two avenues by which we are tempted: Satan and our own sinful flesh. Ananias and his wife, Sapphira, wanting to appear more spiritual than they really were, lied to the apostles and pretended they were giving as an offering the full price of some property they had sold. Peter confronted them: “How is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land?” (verse 3). In this instance, Peter knew that the temptation to lie had come from Satan. Ananias and his wife both gave in to that temptation (verses 7-10).
Lie to the Holy Spirit (5:3) - Ananias lied to the ever-present Holy Spirit in him (1 Corinthians 6:19, 20) and in the church (Ephesians 2:21, 22). In Christian theology, lying to the Holy Spirit is a severe offense because it is considered lying directly to God. Consequences span from immediate divine judgment, such as physical death, to spiritual alienation, loss of fellowship, and ongoing spiritual corruption.
Great Fear (5:5) - This was one of the reasons for the swift, strict, and sudden event. It was to instill in the minds of the people the terrifying nature of just how close the judgment of the Lord can be at any time. People sin every day, as if God doesn't see or care about it, but it is not as if God is far off and unconcerned. He is right among His people, and He is perfectly aware of the things that we do – be they right or wrong. They were afraid about the seriousness of hypocrisy and sin in the church. The people learned that death can be the consequence of sin (see 1 Corinthians 11:30-32; 1 John 5:16). That fear extended beyond those present to all who heard about the divine judgment (v. 11). Cf. 1 Peter 3:10; 4:17. It is a common practice among Charismatics and Pentecostals to claim to be “slain in the Spirit.” They fall down and roll around on the ground in supposedly ecstatic states. This type of religion is not found in the epistles, and it does damage to the beauty of the Christian experience, sensationalizing what should be a dignified approach to the holiness of God. When Ananias was slain in the Spirit, it was a permanent effect, and it was because he deserved what happened to him. If believers were punished for treating the holiness of God with such contempt every time they did so, there would very quickly be a lot fewer people filling the halls of churches.
Buried (5:6) - The Jews did not embalm but, customarily, buried the dead the same day, especially someone who died by divine judgment (see Deuteronomy 21:22, 23).
Tempt the Spirit of the Lord (5:9) - Sapphira had gone too far in presuming upon God's forbearance. The folly of such blatant human presumption had to be shown as a sin, hence the ultimate divine chastening that followed.
Tempt the Spirit of the Lord (5:9) - Sapphira had gone too far in presuming upon God's forbearance. The folly of such blatant human presumption had to be shown as a sin, hence the ultimate divine chastening that followed.
Church (5:11) - Here, the word ekklésia is used and translated as “church.” It was used by Jesus in Matthew 16:18 and again twice in Matthew 18:17. It signifies a called-out assembly. It will be used many times as Acts continues, and it will then fill Paul’s epistles. It will also be used in Hebrews, James, 3 John, and Revelation. The word refers to the people who comprise the faith, meaning the faith that leads to an individual’s inclusion in the body of Christ. Faith in what Jesus has accomplished is the key to inclusion. When faith is demonstrated before God, that person is sealed with the Holy Spirit and becomes a member of the ekklésia, or “called out assembly.”
HELPS Word Studies provides a more important meaning for the student of Scripture to remember, saying, “The English word ‘church’ comes from the Greek word kyriakos, ‘belonging to the Lord’ (kyrios). 1577 /ekklēsía (‘church’) is the root of the terms ‘ecclesiology’ and ‘ecclesiastical.’” This called-out body is who Luke is referring to now. They, meaning all of the believers in Christ, are the church, and it is said that great fear came upon them because of what happened to Ananias and Sapphira. They have now come to understand one of the traits of the Lord. He is not just merciful and forgiving, but He is also holy. He is to be treated as such. It is reminiscent of what was said in 1 Samuel 6 when the people realized the sternness of the Lord in judgment –
HELPS Word Studies provides a more important meaning for the student of Scripture to remember, saying, “The English word ‘church’ comes from the Greek word kyriakos, ‘belonging to the Lord’ (kyrios). 1577 /ekklēsía (‘church’) is the root of the terms ‘ecclesiology’ and ‘ecclesiastical.’” This called-out body is who Luke is referring to now. They, meaning all of the believers in Christ, are the church, and it is said that great fear came upon them because of what happened to Ananias and Sapphira. They have now come to understand one of the traits of the Lord. He is not just merciful and forgiving, but He is also holy. He is to be treated as such. It is reminiscent of what was said in 1 Samuel 6 when the people realized the sternness of the Lord in judgment –
Signs and Wonders (5:12) - The words here are teras and sémeion. The teras, or wonder, is something that is done in order to bring about a reaction from those who see it. The effect upon those who witness it is intended to bring about a change in them. A wonder is a thing that is evident in itself. It is something that extends beyond what is normal and is thus considered miraculous. When it is done, it is to be attributed to the Lord because there is no other explanation for it to occur. The sémeion, or sign, is a sign, a miracle, a token, and so on. It generally is given to authenticate, corroborate, or confirm a person or a matter. Whereas a wonder is the thing itself, the sign stands for, testifies to, or points to something else. A simple example of a sign would be the blood of the Passover applied to the doorposts of a house. It is a sign. Jesus’ miracles, at times, are noted as signs. Though they may be miraculous, like the changing of water to wine, they are signs that were given to authenticate Him as the Messiah and His ministry as approved by God. These things, having been done through the apostles, were clear demonstrations of the power and effective working of the Lord, and they were given as confirmations of their office and of the approval by the Lord concerning their ministry.
No Man Join Himself to Them (5:13) - These unbelievers had respect for the followers of Jesus, but feared the deadly potential of joining the church.
Believers . . . Both Men and Women (5:14) - While the unbelievers stayed away due to fear of the consequence of sin, there were multitudes who heard the gospel witness gladly believed, and joined the church. Growth did continue. As Luke records, “And believers.” This is referring to people who have heard the gospel that Christ died for their sins, that He was buried, and that He had risen again. They believed this, accepting the words as true. Thus, they are reckoned among believers. It is to people of this group, believers, that they “were increasingly added.” The verb is imperfect, signifying an ongoing process. They were increasingly (kept on being) added. It shows a continued growth that means people were truly converted, and they had been saved according to the words of the Lord that “whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).
Shadow of Peter (5:15) - The people truly believed Peter had divine healing power and that it might even extend to them through his shadow (cf. 3:1-10). BUT... Scripture does not say Peter's shadow ever healed anyone; in fact, the healing power of God through him seemed to go far beyond his shadow (v. 16), "multitude . . . all were healed"). The sick were not being healed by shadows or auras or magical garments; they were being healed as a direct answer to the apostles’ prayer in Acts 4:30: “Stretch out your hand to heal and perform miraculous signs and wonders through the name of your holy servant Jesus.” The miracles performed by the apostles were demonstrations of the Lord’s power and mercy, affirming Christ Jesus as Savior and testifying that their message was true. This outpouring of healing was an answer to the prayer in 4:29, 30.
Unclean Spirits (5:16) - They are demons, fallen angels (Revelation 12:3) who are so designated because of their vile wickedness. They frequently live inside unbelievers, particularly those who vent their wicked nature.
Rose Up (5:17) - The previous verses spoke of the multitudes who were bringing the sick out into the streets and others coming from surrounding cities, all to be healed. In this, healings were taking place, and it signifies that people were believing that healing was possible. When 457 it came about, the message of the good news would be more readily accepted as well. As such, it would obviously cause consternation to the leaders. In their healing, the people were “rising up,” but this caused a rising up in anger by the jealous leaders of the people. But more, the same word is also used of rebels in Acts 5:36, 37. And so another contrast is probably being inferred between the true leadership of the Lord and the rebellious leadership of the high priest against the Lord. Depending on when this occurred, this high priest could be Caiaphas, noted in John 11:49. He was already opposed to Christ and His message. If he is still the high priest, his rebelliousness against the Lord continues on now. Further, Luke next says, “and all those who were with him.” When one understands that this is a rising up against the purposes of the Lord, which is exactly what is being described, the expression unites these people with the high priest as if they are a bunch of thugs thronging together in order to work their mischief. Of this group, Luke specifically notes it “is the sect of the Sadducees.”
The Common Prison (5:18) - This is the public jail. There is an active arrest going on. This time it isn’t just Peter and John, but it more generally says, “on the apostles.” No indication is given if it is all the apostles, or just some of them, but those that had been meeting together at the time are certainly who are being referred to, be it five, eight, or all twelve. From there, it next notes the actions of those arresting them, saying, “and put them in the common prison.”
Rose Up (5:17) - The previous verses spoke of the multitudes who were bringing the sick out into the streets and others coming from surrounding cities, all to be healed. In this, healings were taking place, and it signifies that people were believing that healing was possible. When 457 it came about, the message of the good news would be more readily accepted as well. As such, it would obviously cause consternation to the leaders. In their healing, the people were “rising up,” but this caused a rising up in anger by the jealous leaders of the people. But more, the same word is also used of rebels in Acts 5:36, 37. And so another contrast is probably being inferred between the true leadership of the Lord and the rebellious leadership of the high priest against the Lord. Depending on when this occurred, this high priest could be Caiaphas, noted in John 11:49. He was already opposed to Christ and His message. If he is still the high priest, his rebelliousness against the Lord continues on now. Further, Luke next says, “and all those who were with him.” When one understands that this is a rising up against the purposes of the Lord, which is exactly what is being described, the expression unites these people with the high priest as if they are a bunch of thugs thronging together in order to work their mischief. Of this group, Luke specifically notes it “is the sect of the Sadducees.”
The Common Prison (5:18) - This is the public jail. There is an active arrest going on. This time it isn’t just Peter and John, but it more generally says, “on the apostles.” No indication is given if it is all the apostles, or just some of them, but those that had been meeting together at the time are certainly who are being referred to, be it five, eight, or all twelve. From there, it next notes the actions of those arresting them, saying, “and put them in the common prison.”


